Assessing Growth and Development for Orthodontic Planning

Assessing Growth and Development for Orthodontic Planning

Importance of Early Orthodontic Evaluation

The field of orthodontics, an intricate blend of art and science, hinges significantly on the understanding and assessment of growth and development. This crucial aspect cannot be overstated as it forms the bedrock for effective orthodontic planning. Recognizing the importance of assessing growth and development in orthodontics is akin to a sculptor understanding the nuances of his clay before molding it into a masterpiece.


Children with overbites or underbites may benefit from braces Braces for kids and teens jaw.

Growth and development assessment in orthodontics primarily involves evaluating both craniofacial growth patterns and dental maturation. These assessments are pivotal because they allow orthodontists to tailor treatment plans that align harmoniously with an individual's unique developmental trajectory. Without this critical evaluation, there is a risk of implementing interventions that may not only be ineffective but could also disrupt natural growth processes.


One key reason why assessing growth is indispensable lies in its ability to influence timing decisions for various treatments. Orthodontic interventions can be time-sensitive; certain conditions necessitate intervention during specific stages of a patient's growth for optimal results. For instance, interceptive treatments might aim to guide jaw growth or address functional problems when children are still growing. Missing these windows due to inadequate assessment can lead to more complex issues requiring extensive corrective procedures later on.


Moreover, understanding an individual's developmental stage enables clinicians to predict changes that may occur over time, allowing them to chart a course that anticipates future needs rather than merely addressing present concerns. This forward-thinking approach ensures that treatments not only resolve current malocclusions but also contribute positively to long-term oral health outcomes.


Furthermore, accurate assessment fosters better communication between practitioners and patients (or their guardians). When orthodontists have a deep comprehension of growth patterns, they can explain treatment plans more effectively, setting realistic expectations regarding outcomes and duration. This transparency helps build trust and collaboration in the patient-practitioner relationship-a cornerstone for successful treatment adherence.


In addition to improving clinical outcomes, assessing growth and development holds economic significance as well. By enabling targeted interventions at appropriate times, unnecessary treatments or revisions can be avoided, reducing overall costs for both practitioners and patients.


Advanced diagnostic tools such as cephalometric analysis, 3D imaging technologies, and genetic testing have significantly enhanced our ability to assess craniofacial development accurately. These innovations provide detailed insights into each patient's unique anatomy and potential future changes-tools that are indispensable in modern orthodontic practice.


In conclusion, the importance of assessing growth and development in orthodontics cannot be understated; it is fundamental to crafting precise treatment plans tailored to individual needs. This careful appraisal ensures not only immediate efficacy but also supports sustainable oral health by anticipating future developments. As technology advances further, our capacity for accurate assessments will undoubtedly grow stronger-paving the way for increasingly personalized care that respects both artistic vision and scientific rigor in shaping confident smiles around the world.

Understanding the key factors influencing dental and facial growth in children is crucial for effective orthodontic planning. The dynamic interplay between genetic, environmental, nutritional, and functional elements shapes the craniofacial structure during a child's developmental years. Recognizing these influences allows orthodontists to forecast growth patterns and tailor interventions that align with each child's unique needs.


Genetics plays a foundational role in determining the baseline potential for dental and facial development. Inherited traits from parents can dictate aspects such as jaw size, tooth eruption timing, and overall facial symmetry. However, while genetics set the stage, they interact continuously with environmental factors that can significantly alter growth trajectories.


Environmental influences encompass a wide range of factors including socioeconomic status, access to healthcare resources, and cultural practices. Children who grow up in environments with limited access to dental care may experience untreated conditions like cavities or malocclusion that can impact their overall facial development. Conversely, regular dental check-ups can help mitigate these issues early on.


Nutritional factors are equally important in assessing growth and development for orthodontic planning. Adequate nutrition supports healthy bone growth and tooth development. Deficiencies in essential vitamins and minerals like calcium or vitamin D can lead to underdeveloped jaw structures or delayed tooth eruption. Ensuring that children receive a balanced diet rich in necessary nutrients is vital for optimal dental health.


Functional habits also play a significant role in shaping the dental arch and facial structure. Habits such as thumb sucking, mouth breathing, or prolonged use of pacifiers can influence the alignment of teeth and position of jaws over time. Orthodontists often guide parents on managing these habits to prevent potential adverse effects on their child's oral development.


In addition to these primary factors, it's important to consider the timing of intervention when planning orthodontic treatment. Early assessment during key developmental milestones allows for timely identification of potential issues before they become more complex problems requiring extensive correction later on.


Ultimately, understanding the multifaceted factors influencing dental and facial growth is essential for creating effective orthodontic plans tailored specifically to each child's unique circumstances. By considering genetics alongside environmental context, nutritional status, functional habits-and intervening at appropriate times-orthodontists can support healthier outcomes through personalized approaches that foster both functional efficiency and aesthetic harmony in growing children's smiles.

Benefits of Early Intervention in Orthodontics

Evaluating dental and skeletal maturity is a critical component in assessing growth and development for orthodontic planning. This process helps orthodontists design treatment plans that are tailored to the unique developmental stage of each patient, ensuring optimal results. Accurate assessment of both dental and skeletal maturity allows practitioners to predict growth spurts, determine the timing of intervention, and enhance the efficiency of orthodontic treatments.


Dental maturity evaluation primarily involves examining the sequence and stages of tooth eruption. Panoramic radiographs are commonly used to assess the development of individual teeth by comparing them with established standards. The Demirjian method is one such standard, widely recognized for its reliability in estimating dental age through the analysis of mandibular teeth development. By determining how far along a patient is in their dental eruption sequence, orthodontists can make informed decisions about when to start or adjust treatment plans.


Skeletal maturity assessment, on the other hand, provides insights into a patient's overall physical development. It typically involves analyzing hand-wrist radiographs or cervical vertebrae from lateral cephalometric radiographs. The hand-wrist method evaluates ossification stages of bones in the hand and wrist region, correlating these stages with growth velocity peaks. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method assesses changes in the shape of cervical vertebrae as indicators of skeletal growth phases.


Combining these methods offers a comprehensive view of an individual's growth pattern. For instance, while dental maturity might indicate readiness for certain orthodontic interventions like braces or retainers, skeletal maturity can confirm whether significant jaw growth is still anticipated. Such synchronization ensures that treatments not only address current alignment issues but also accommodate future changes due to growth.


The importance of evaluating both dental and skeletal maturity cannot be overstated in orthodontics. It prevents premature or delayed interventions that could lead to suboptimal outcomes or extended treatment durations. Furthermore, understanding these maturational indices assists in predicting long-term stability after active treatment concludes.


In conclusion, accurately assessing dental and skeletal maturity facilitates strategic decision-making in orthodontic planning by aligning treatments with each patient's unique developmental timeline. This personalized approach is vital for achieving effective results and promoting oral health throughout an individual's life span. As techniques continue to evolve with advancements in imaging technology and research, orthodontists are better equipped than ever to deliver precise care tailored to their patients' needs.

Benefits of Early Intervention in Orthodontics

Overview of Comprehensive Orthodontic Strategies

The role of timing in orthodontic intervention and treatment planning, particularly concerning the assessment of growth and development, is a crucial aspect that significantly influences the success of orthodontic outcomes. Orthodontics is not merely about aligning teeth but also involves understanding the biological processes governing facial growth and dental development. The intricacies of these processes underscore the importance of timely interventions.


During childhood and adolescence, individuals undergo significant physiological changes. The growth spurts associated with puberty provide a unique window for orthodontists to manipulate and guide jaw development effectively. This period, often referred to as the "growth spurt," is characterized by accelerated bone growth which can be harnessed to correct skeletal discrepancies. For instance, addressing a developing malocclusion during this phase can lead to more stable long-term results compared to attempting similar corrections after growth has ceased.


However, determining the optimal timing for intervention requires a comprehensive understanding of each patient's unique developmental trajectory. Growth patterns vary widely among individuals; thus, orthodontists must assess various indicators such as dental age, skeletal maturity, and physical development milestones. Techniques like hand-wrist radiographs or cervical vertebral maturation assessments are frequently employed to gauge these factors accurately.


Intervening too early or too late can have implications on treatment efficacy. Early intervention might seem advantageous by preventing future complications, yet it may result in prolonged treatment duration if initiated before significant growth has occurred. Conversely, delaying treatment until after peak growth periods may necessitate more invasive procedures such as surgery due to reduced adaptability of mature bones.


Moreover, psychological readiness should not be overlooked in timing considerations. Adolescents who are more psychologically prepared for orthodontic appliances tend to adhere better to treatment protocols, enhancing overall success rates.


In conclusion, timing is an indispensable element in orthodontic intervention and treatment planning within the context of assessing growth and development. By aligning interventions with key developmental stages-particularly during pivotal growth spurts-orthodontists can optimize functional outcomes while minimizing invasiveness. Thus, personalized assessment remains vital in crafting effective treatment plans that consider both physiological maturity and patient readiness. The delicate balance between biology and precision underscores why timing holds such paramount importance in modern orthodontics.

Role of Technology in Modern Pediatric Orthodontics

Case Studies Highlighting Successful Early Interventions in Assessing Growth and Development for Orthodontic Planning


Orthodontics, the branch of dentistry concerned with diagnosing, preventing, and correcting malpositioned teeth and jaws, plays a critical role in ensuring oral health and aesthetic appeal. One of the most pivotal aspects of orthodontic treatment is early intervention, which involves assessing growth and development at a young age to prevent more severe dental issues later in life. Case studies from various clinical settings have demonstrated the profound impact that timely interventions can have on an individual's dental health trajectory.


The foundation of successful orthodontic intervention lies in the accurate assessment of a child's growth patterns and developmental milestones. The American Association of Orthodontists recommends that children receive an initial orthodontic evaluation by the age of seven. This early assessment allows orthodontists to identify potential issues that may benefit from early treatment, such as overcrowding, crossbites, or jaw misalignment.


One illustrative case study involves an eight-year-old patient who presented with significant crowding in the anterior teeth region. Through careful analysis using cephalometric radiographs and 3D imaging technologies, it was determined that interceptive extractions combined with a space maintainer would guide proper alignment as permanent teeth erupted. Over several months, this proactive approach not only alleviated crowding but also facilitated normal jaw growth patterns, thus averting the need for more complex procedures like jaw surgery in adolescence.


Another compelling case highlights a ten-year-old patient diagnosed with a Class II malocclusion due to mandibular deficiency. Traditional methods might have delayed treatment until adolescence; however, early intervention using functional appliances was initiated. These appliances stimulated mandibular growth during peak periods of skeletal maturation. After two years of treatment followed by retention strategies to stabilize results, the patient's bite improved significantly without invasive measures.


Furthermore, some cases emphasize psychosocial benefits accompanying early interventions. A twelve-year-old girl experiencing bullying due to protruding front teeth found solace through phased orthodontic treatments that gradually corrected her overjet while boosting self-esteem during formative school years.


These case studies underscore the transformative potential inherent in early orthodontic assessments and interventions. By understanding each child's unique growth patterns and leveraging innovative diagnostic tools like digital modeling and genetic markers for predicting eruption sequences or growth spurts, clinicians can tailor treatments effectively.


In conclusion, successful early interventions rooted in comprehensive assessments are paramount for optimizing orthodontic outcomes - shaping not just smiles but overall well-being throughout childhood into adulthood. As technology advances further alongside our understanding of craniofacial biology dynamics within pediatric populations globally-early preventive care will remain indispensable within modern orthodontics landscape ensuring healthier futures one youthful grin at time!

Tips for Parents: Ensuring Successful Orthodontic Outcomes for Children

Assessing growth and development in pediatric orthodontic assessment is a nuanced process that demands both scientific rigor and a deep understanding of individual variability. It is a critical step in orthodontic planning, which aims to align teeth, improve facial aesthetics, and ensure optimal oral function. However, this endeavor comes with its own set of challenges and considerations that orthodontists must navigate carefully.


One of the primary challenges in assessing growth and development is the inherent variability in children's developmental timelines. Unlike adults, children are still growing, and their craniofacial structures are constantly changing. This makes it difficult to predict future growth accurately. Orthodontists must therefore rely on growth prediction models that consider factors such as age, gender, genetic background, and environmental influences. Yet even with these tools, predictions can sometimes be imprecise due to the unique nature of each child's growth pattern.


Another significant consideration is the timing of intervention. Early assessment can be beneficial as it allows for interceptive measures that can guide jaw development and prevent more severe malocclusions later on. However, intervening too early might result in prolonged treatment time or unnecessary procedures if the child's condition would have resolved naturally over time. Therefore, determining the right moment to initiate treatment requires a careful balance of clinical judgment and empirical evidence.


Furthermore, communication with both young patients and their parents is essential but challenging. Children's cooperation levels vary greatly depending on their age and understanding of the treatment process. Consequently, orthodontists must employ strategies to ensure that children comprehend what their treatment entails while also addressing any fears or concerns they may have. Similarly, explaining complex medical information to parents in an accessible manner is crucial for informed consent and active participation in decision-making.


Technological advancements offer solutions but also pose new challenges in pediatric orthodontic assessments. Digital imaging techniques such as 3D scans provide detailed insights into skeletal structures without invasive procedures; however, they require significant investment in equipment and training. Moreover, interpreting these advanced images accurately demands specialized knowledge that not all practitioners may possess.


In conclusion, assessing growth and development for orthodontic planning involves tackling various challenges related to predicting developmental trajectories, timing interventions appropriately, ensuring effective communication with young patients and their parents, as well as integrating technological innovations into practice responsibly. Addressing these complexities requires a combination of expertise rooted in both science and art-a testament to the intricate nature of pediatric orthodontics where each child presents a unique case deserving personalized care plans tailored towards achieving optimal long-term outcomes for oral health and overall wellbeing.

As the field of orthodontics continues to advance, the importance of accurately assessing growth and development becomes increasingly paramount. Orthodontic planning relies heavily on understanding the intricate processes that govern craniofacial growth. Thus, future directions in growth assessment techniques are poised to significantly enhance outcomes, ensuring more effective and personalized treatment strategies.


Traditionally, orthodontists have relied on a combination of clinical examinations, cephalometric analysis, and age-based predictions to assess growth patterns. While these methods have been useful, they often lack precision due to inherent inter-individual variability in growth trajectories. As we move forward, there is a growing emphasis on leveraging technological advancements and integrating multidisciplinary approaches to refine these assessments.


One promising avenue involves the use of three-dimensional imaging technologies such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Unlike traditional two-dimensional radiographs, CBCT provides comprehensive images of dental structures and craniofacial anatomy with high accuracy. This enables orthodontists to visualize complex anatomical relationships and monitor changes over time with greater clarity. Additionally, software advancements are allowing for sophisticated simulations that can predict future growth patterns more reliably than before.


Another emerging trend is the incorporation of genetic and molecular insights into growth assessment. Understanding the genetic factors that influence craniofacial development can offer predictive insights into individual growth patterns. By identifying specific genetic markers associated with certain growth trends or anomalies, orthodontists can tailor treatment plans more precisely to align with each patient's unique biological blueprint.


Furthermore, machine learning algorithms are beginning to play a transformative role in predicting orthodontic outcomes. These algorithms can analyze vast datasets from previous cases to identify patterns and correlations that might not be evident through traditional analysis. By harnessing artificial intelligence tools, practitioners can potentially forecast treatment responses more accurately and adjust interventions proactively.


The integration of telemedicine platforms also represents an exciting frontier in this domain. Remote monitoring systems equipped with advanced sensors could allow patients' progress to be tracked continuously without frequent office visits. Such systems would provide real-time data on oral health metrics which could be fed back into predictive models for ongoing refinement of treatment plans.


In conclusion, the future directions in growth assessment techniques for orthodontic planning highlight a shift towards greater precision and personalization driven by technological innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration. By embracing three-dimensional imaging, genetic research, machine learning analytics, and remote monitoring capabilities among other developments - clinicians will be better equipped than ever before not only at anticipating developmental pathways but also at crafting interventions tailored specifically towards improving patient outcomes effectively while minimizing risks associated with conventional methodologies thereby revolutionizing modern dentistry practices altogether ensuring healthier smiles across generations yet unborn!

Malocclusion
Malocclusion in 10-year-old girl
Specialty Dentistry Edit this on Wikidata

In orthodontics, a malocclusion is a misalignment or incorrect relation between the teeth of the upper and lower dental arches when they approach each other as the jaws close. The English-language term dates from 1864;[1] Edward Angle (1855–1930), the "father of modern orthodontics",[2][3][need quotation to verify] popularised it. The word derives from mal- 'incorrect' and occlusion 'the manner in which opposing teeth meet'.

The malocclusion classification is based on the relationship of the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar.  If this molar relationship exists, then the teeth can align into normal occlusion. According to Angle, malocclusion is any deviation of the occlusion from the ideal.[4] However, assessment for malocclusion should also take into account aesthetics and the impact on functionality. If these aspects are acceptable to the patient despite meeting the formal definition of malocclusion, then treatment may not be necessary. It is estimated that nearly 30% of the population have malocclusions that are categorised as severe and definitely benefit from orthodontic treatment.[5]

Causes

[edit]

The aetiology of malocclusion is somewhat contentious, however, simply put it is multifactorial, with influences being both genetic[6][unreliable source?] and environmental.[7] Malocclusion is already present in one of the Skhul and Qafzeh hominin fossils and other prehistoric human skulls.[8][9] There are three generally accepted causative factors of malocclusion:

  • Skeletal factors – the size, shape and relative positions of the upper and lower jaws. Variations can be caused by environmental or behavioral factors such as muscles of mastication, nocturnal mouth breathing, and cleft lip and cleft palate.
  • Muscle factors – the form and function of the muscles that surround the teeth.  This could be impacted by habits such as finger sucking, nail biting, pacifier and tongue thrusting[10]
  • Dental factors – size of the teeth in relation to the jaw, early loss of teeth could result in spacing or mesial migration causing crowding, abnormal eruption path or timings, extra teeth (supernumeraries), or too few teeth (hypodontia)

There is not one single cause of malocclusion, and when planning orthodontic treatment it is often helpful to consider the above factors and the impact they have played on malocclusion. These can also be influenced by oral habits and pressure resulting in malocclusion.[11][12]

Behavioral and dental factors

[edit]

In the active skeletal growth,[13] mouthbreathing, finger sucking, thumb sucking, pacifier sucking, onychophagia (nail biting), dermatophagia, pen biting, pencil biting, abnormal posture, deglutition disorders and other habits greatly influence the development of the face and dental arches.[14][15][16][17][18] Pacifier sucking habits are also correlated with otitis media.[19][20] Dental caries, periapical inflammation and tooth loss in the deciduous teeth can alter the correct permanent teeth eruptions.

Primary vs. secondary dentition

[edit]

Malocclusion can occur in primary and secondary dentition.

In primary dentition malocclusion is caused by:

  • Underdevelopment of the dentoalvelor tissue.
  • Over development of bones around the mouth.
  • Cleft lip and palate.
  • Overcrowding of teeth.
  • Abnormal development and growth of teeth.

In secondary dentition malocclusion is caused by:

  • Periodontal disease.
  • Overeruption of teeth.[21]
  • Premature and congenital loss of missing teeth.

Signs and symptoms

[edit]

Malocclusion is a common finding,[22][23] although it is not usually serious enough to require treatment. Those who have more severe malocclusions, which present as a part of craniofacial anomalies, may require orthodontic and sometimes surgical treatment (orthognathic surgery) to correct the problem.

The ultimate goal of orthodontic treatment is to achieve a stable, functional and aesthetic alignment of teeth which serves to better the patient's dental and total health.[24] The symptoms which arise as a result of malocclusion derive from a deficiency in one or more of these categories.[25]

The symptoms are as follows:

  • Tooth decay (caries): misaligned teeth will make it more difficult to maintain oral hygiene. Children with poor oral hygiene and diet will be at an increased risk.
  • Periodontal disease: irregular teeth would hinder the ability to clean teeth meaning poor plaque control. Additionally, if teeth are crowded, some may be more buccally or lingually placed, there will be reduced bone and periodontal support. Furthermore, in Class III malocclusions, mandibular anterior teeth are pushed labially which contributes to gingival recession and weakens periodontal support.
  • Trauma to anterior teeth: Those with an increased overjet are at an increased risk of trauma. A systematic review found that an overjet of greater than 3mm will double the risk of trauma.
  • Masticatory function: people with anterior open bites, large increased & reverse overjet and hypodontia will find it more difficult to chew food.
  • Speech impairment: a lisp is when the incisors cannot make contact, orthodontics can treat this. However, other forms of misaligned teeth will have little impact on speech and orthodontic treatment has little effect on fixing any problems.  
  • Tooth impaction: these can cause resorption of adjacent teeth and other pathologies for example a dentigerous cyst formation.  
  • Psychosocial wellbeing: malocclusions of teeth with poor aesthetics can have a significant effect on self-esteem.

Malocclusions may be coupled with skeletal disharmony of the face, where the relations between the upper and lower jaws are not appropriate. Such skeletal disharmonies often distort sufferer's face shape, severely affect aesthetics of the face, and may be coupled with mastication or speech problems. Most skeletal malocclusions can only be treated by orthognathic surgery.[citation needed]

Classification

[edit]

Depending on the sagittal relations of teeth and jaws, malocclusions can be divided mainly into three types according to Angle's classification system published 1899. However, there are also other conditions, e.g. crowding of teeth, not directly fitting into this classification.

Many authors have tried to modify or replace Angle's classification. This has resulted in many subtypes and new systems (see section below: Review of Angle's system of classes).

A deep bite (also known as a Type II Malocclusion) is a condition in which the upper teeth overlap the lower teeth, which can result in hard and soft tissue trauma, in addition to an effect on appearance.[26] It has been found to occur in 15–20% of the US population.[27]

An open bite is a condition characterised by a complete lack of overlap and occlusion between the upper and lower incisors.[28] In children, open bite can be caused by prolonged thumb sucking.[29] Patients often present with impaired speech and mastication.[30]

Overbites

[edit]

This is a vertical measurement of the degree of overlap between the maxillary incisors and the mandibular incisors. There are three features that are analysed in the classification of an overbite:

  • Degree of overlap: edge to edge, reduced, average, increased
  • Complete or incomplete: whether there is contact between the lower teeth and the opposing teeth/tissue (hard palate or gingivae) or not.
  • Whether contact is traumatic or atraumatic

An average overbite is when the upper anterior teeth cover a third of the lower teeth. Covering less than this is described as ‘reduced’ and more than this is an ‘increased’ overbite. No overlap or contact is considered an ‘anterior open bite’.[25][31][32]

Angle's classification method

[edit]
Class I with severe crowding and labially erupted canines
Class II molar relationship

Edward Angle, who is considered the father of modern orthodontics, was the first to classify malocclusion. He based his classifications on the relative position of the maxillary first molar.[33] According to Angle, the mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first molar should align with the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. The teeth should all fit on a line of occlusion which, in the upper arch, is a smooth curve through the central fossae of the posterior teeth and cingulum of the canines and incisors, and in the lower arch, is a smooth curve through the buccal cusps of the posterior teeth and incisal edges of the anterior teeth. Any variations from this resulted in malocclusion types. It is also possible to have different classes of malocclusion on left and right sides.

  • Class I (Neutrocclusion): Here the molar relationship of the occlusion is normal but the incorrect line of occlusion or as described for the maxillary first molar, but the other teeth have problems like spacing, crowding, over or under eruption, etc.
  • Class II (Distocclusion (retrognathism, overjet, overbite)): In this situation, the mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first molar is not aligned with the mesiobuccal groove of the lower first molar. Instead it is anterior to it. Usually the mesiobuccal cusp rests in between the first mandibular molars and second premolars. There are two subtypes:
    • Class II Division 1: The molar relationships are like that of Class II and the anterior teeth are protruded.
    • Class II Division 2: The molar relationships are Class II but the central are retroclined and the lateral teeth are seen overlapping the centrals.
  • Class III: (Mesiocclusion (prognathism, anterior crossbite, negative overjet, underbite)) In this case the upper molars are placed not in the mesiobuccal groove but posteriorly to it. The mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar lies posteriorly to the mesiobuccal groove of the mandibular first molar. Usually seen as when the lower front teeth are more prominent than the upper front teeth. In this case the patient very often has a large mandible or a short maxillary bone.

Review of Angle's system of classes and alternative systems

[edit]

A major disadvantage of Angle's system of classifying malocclusions is that it only considers two dimensions along a spatial axis in the sagittal plane in the terminal occlusion, but occlusion problems can be three-dimensional. It does not recognise deviations in other spatial axes, asymmetric deviations, functional faults and other therapy-related features.

Angle's classification system also lacks a theoretical basis; it is purely descriptive. Its much-discussed weaknesses include that it only considers static occlusion, it does not account for the development and causes (aetiology) of occlusion problems, and it disregards the proportions (or relationships in general) of teeth and face.[34] Thus, many attempts have been made to modify the Angle system or to replace it completely with a more efficient one,[35] but Angle's classification continues be popular mainly because of its simplicity and clarity.[citation needed]

Well-known modifications to Angle's classification date back to Martin Dewey (1915) and Benno Lischer (1912, 1933). Alternative systems have been suggested by, among others, Simon (1930, the first three-dimensional classification system), Jacob A. Salzmann (1950, with a classification system based on skeletal structures) and James L. Ackerman and William R. Proffit (1969).[36]

Incisor classification

[edit]

Besides the molar relationship, the British Standards Institute Classification also classifies malocclusion into incisor relationship and canine relationship.

  • Class I: The lower incisor edges occlude with or lie immediately below the cingulum plateau of the upper central incisors
  • Class II: The lower incisor edges lie posterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors
    • Division 1 – the upper central incisors are proclined or of average inclination and there is an increase in overjet
    • Division 2 – The upper central incisors are retroclined. The overjet is usually minimal or may be increased.
  • Class III: The lower incisor edges lie anterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors. The overjet is reduced or reversed.

Canine relationship by Ricketts

[edit]
  • Class I: Mesial slope of upper canine coincides with distal slope of lower canine
  • Class II: Mesial slope of upper canine is ahead of distal slope of lower canine
  • Class III: Mesial slope of upper canine is behind to distal slope of lower canine

Crowding of teeth

[edit]

Dental crowding is defined by the amount of space that would be required for the teeth to be in correct alignment. It is obtained in two ways: 1) by measuring the amount of space required and reducing this from calculating the space available via the width of the teeth, or 2) by measuring the degree of overlap of the teeth.

The following criterion is used:[25]

  • 0-4mm = Mild crowding
  • 4-8mm = Moderate crowding
  • >8mm = Severe crowding

Causes

[edit]

Genetic (inheritance) factors, extra teeth, lost teeth, impacted teeth, or abnormally shaped teeth have been cited as causes of crowding. Ill-fitting dental fillings, crowns, appliances, retainers, or braces as well as misalignment of jaw fractures after a severe injury are also known to cause crowding.[26] Tumors of the mouth and jaw, thumb sucking, tongue thrusting, pacifier use beyond age three, and prolonged use of a bottle have also been identified.[26]

Lack of masticatory stress during development can cause tooth overcrowding.[37][38] Children who chewed a hard resinous gum for two hours a day showed increased facial growth.[37] Experiments in animals have shown similar results. In an experiment on two groups of rock hyraxes fed hardened or softened versions of the same foods, the animals fed softer food had significantly narrower and shorter faces and thinner and shorter mandibles than animals fed hard food.[37][39][failed verification]

A 2016 review found that breastfeeding lowers the incidence of malocclusions developing later on in developing infants.[40]

During the transition to agriculture, the shape of the human mandible went through a series of changes. The mandible underwent a complex shape changes not matched by the teeth, leading to incongruity between the dental and mandibular form. These changes in human skulls may have been "driven by the decreasing bite forces required to chew the processed foods eaten once humans switched to growing different types of cereals, milking and herding animals about 10,000 years ago."[38][41]

Treatment

[edit]

Orthodontic management of the condition includes dental braces, lingual braces, clear aligners or palatal expanders.[42] Other treatments include the removal of one or more teeth and the repair of injured teeth. In some cases, surgery may be necessary.[43]

Treatment

[edit]

Malocclusion is often treated with orthodontics,[42] such as tooth extraction, clear aligners, or dental braces,[44] followed by growth modification in children or jaw surgery (orthognathic surgery) in adults. Surgical intervention is used only in rare occasions. This may include surgical reshaping to lengthen or shorten the jaw. Wires, plates, or screws may be used to secure the jaw bone, in a manner like the surgical stabilization of jaw fractures. Very few people have "perfect" alignment of their teeth with most problems being minor that do not require treatment.[37]

Crowding

[edit]

Crowding of the teeth is treated with orthodontics, often with tooth extraction, clear aligners, or dental braces, followed by growth modification in children or jaw surgery (orthognathic surgery) in adults. Surgery may be required on rare occasions. This may include surgical reshaping to lengthen or shorten the jaw (orthognathic surgery). Wires, plates, or screws may be used to secure the jaw bone, in a manner similar to the surgical stabilization of jaw fractures. Very few people have "perfect" alignment of their teeth. However, most problems are very minor and do not require treatment.[39]

Class I

[edit]

While treatment is not crucial in class I malocclusions, in severe cases of crowding can be an indication for intervention. Studies indicate that tooth extraction can have benefits to correcting malocclusion in individuals.[45][46] Further research is needed as reoccurring crowding has been examined in other clinical trials.[45][47]

Class II

[edit]

A few treatment options for class II malocclusions include:

  1. Functional appliance which maintains the mandible in a postured position to influence both the orofacial musculature and dentoalveolar development prior to fixed appliance therapy. This is ideally done through pubertal growth in pre-adolescent children and the fixed appliance during permanent dentition .[48] Different types of removable appliances include Activator, Bionatar, Medium opening activator, Herbst, Frankel and twin block appliance with the twin block being the most widely used one.[49]
  2. Growth modification through headgear to redirect maxillary growth
  3. Orthodontic camouflage so that jaw discrepancy no longer apparent
  4. Orthognathic surgery – sagittal split osteotomy mandibular advancement carried out when growth is complete where skeletal discrepancy is severe in anterior-posterior relationship or in vertical direction. Fixed appliance is required before, during and after surgery.
  5. Upper Removable Appliance – limited role in contemporary treatment of increased overjets. Mostly used for very mild Class II, overjet due to incisor proclination, favourable overbite.

Class II Division 1

[edit]

Low- to moderate- quality evidence suggests that providing early orthodontic treatment for children with prominent upper front teeth (class II division 1) is more effective for reducing the incidence of incisal trauma than providing one course of orthodontic treatment in adolescence.[50] There do not appear to be any other advantages of providing early treatment when compared to late treatment.[50] Low-quality evidence suggests that, compared to no treatment, late treatment in adolescence with functional appliances is effective for reducing the prominence of upper front teeth.[50]

Class II Division 2

[edit]

Treatment can be undertaken using orthodontic treatments using dental braces.[51] While treatment is carried out, there is no evidence from clinical trials to recommend or discourage any type of orthodontic treatment in children.[51] A 2018 Cochrane systematic review anticipated that the evidence base supporting treatment approaches is not likely to improve occlusion due to the low prevalence of the condition and the ethical difficulties in recruiting people to participate in a randomized controlled trials for treating this condition.[51]

Class III

[edit]

The British Standard Institute (BSI) classify class III incisor relationship as the lower incisor edge lies anterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors, with reduced or reversed over jet.[52] The skeletal facial deformity is characterized by mandibular prognathism, maxillary retrognathism or a combination of the two. This effects 3-8% of UK population with a higher incidence seen in Asia.[53]

One of the main reasons for correcting Class III malocclusion is aesthetics and function. This can have a psychological impact on the person with malocclusion resulting in speech and mastication problems as well. In mild class III cases, the patient is quite accepting of the aesthetics and the situation is monitored to observe the progression of skeletal growth.[54]

Maxillary and mandibular skeletal changes during prepubertal, pubertal and post pubertal stages show that class III malocclusion is established before the prepubertal stage.[55] One treatment option is the use of growth modification appliances such as the Chin Cap which has greatly improved the skeletal framework in the initial stages. However, majority of cases are shown to relapse into inherited class III malocclusion during the pubertal growth stage and when the appliance is removed after treatment.[55]

Another approach is to carry out orthognathic surgery, such as a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) which is indicated by horizontal mandibular excess. This involves surgically cutting through the mandible and moving the fragment forward or backwards for desired function and is supplemented with pre and post surgical orthodontics to ensure correct tooth relationship. Although the most common surgery of the mandible, it comes with several complications including: bleeding from inferior alveolar artery, unfavorable splits, condylar resorption, avascular necrosis and worsening of temporomandibular joint.[56]

Orthodontic camouflage can also be used in patients with mild skeletal discrepancies. This is a less invasive approach that uses orthodontic brackets to correct malocclusion and try to hide the skeletal discrepancy. Due to limitations of orthodontics, this option is more viable for patients who are not as concerned about the aesthetics of their facial appearance and are happy to address the malocclusion only, as well as avoiding the risks which come with orthognathic surgery. Cephalometric data can aid in the differentiation between the cases that benefit from ortho-surgical or orthodontic treatment only (camouflage); for instance, examining a large group of orthognathic patient with Class III malocclusions they had average ANB angle of -3.57° (95% CI, -3.92° to -3.21°). [57]

Deep bite

[edit]

The most common corrective treatments available are fixed or removal appliances (such as dental braces), which may or may not require surgical intervention. At this time there is no robust evidence that treatment will be successful.[51]

Open bite

[edit]

An open bite malocclusion is when the upper teeth don't overlap the lower teeth. When this malocclusion occurs at the front teeth it is known as anterior open bite. An open bite is difficult to treat due to multifactorial causes, with relapse being a major concern. This is particularly so for an anterior open bite.[58] Therefore, it is important to carry out a thorough initial assessment in order to obtain a diagnosis to tailor a suitable treatment plan.[58] It is important to take into consideration any habitual risk factors, as this is crucial for a successful outcome without relapse. Treatment approach includes behavior changes, appliances and surgery. Treatment for adults include a combination of extractions, fixed appliances, intermaxillary elastics and orthognathic surgery.[30] For children, orthodontics is usually used to compensate for continued growth. With children with mixed dentition, the malocclusion may resolve on its own as the permanent teeth erupt. Furthermore, should the malocclusion be caused by childhood habits such as digit, thumb or pacifier sucking, it may result in resolution as the habit is stopped. Habit deterrent appliances may be used to help in breaking digit and thumb sucking habits. Other treatment options for patients who are still growing include functional appliances and headgear appliances.

Tooth size discrepancy

[edit]

Identifying the presence of tooth size discrepancies between the maxillary and mandibular arches is an important component of correct orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

To establish appropriate alignment and occlusion, the size of upper and lower front teeth, or upper and lower teeth in general, needs to be proportional. Inter-arch tooth size discrepancy (ITSD) is defined as a disproportion in the mesio-distal dimensions of teeth of opposing dental arches. The prevalence is clinically significant among orthodontic patients and has been reported to range from 17% to 30%.[59]

Identifying inter-arch tooth size discrepancy (ITSD) before treatment begins allows the practitioner to develop the treatment plan in a way that will take ITSD into account. ITSD corrective treatment may entail demanding reduction (interproximal wear), increase (crowns and resins), or elimination (extractions) of dental mass prior to treatment finalization.[60]

Several methods have been used to determine ITSD. Of these methods the one most commonly used is the Bolton analysis. Bolton developed a method to calculate the ratio between the mesiodistal width of maxillary and mandibular teeth and stated that a correct and harmonious occlusion is possible only with adequate proportionality of tooth sizes.[60] Bolton's formula concludes that if in the anterior portion the ratio is less than 77.2% the lower teeth are too narrow, the upper teeth are too wide or there is a combination of both. If the ratio is higher than 77.2% either the lower teeth are too wide, the upper teeth are too narrow or there is a combination of both.[59]

Other conditions

[edit]
Open bite treatment after eight months of braces.

Other kinds of malocclusions can be due to or horizontal, vertical, or transverse skeletal discrepancies, including skeletal asymmetries.

Increased vertical growth causes a long facial profile and commonly leads to an open bite malocclusion, while decreased vertical facial growth causes a short facial profile and is commonly associated with a deep bite malocclusion. However, there are many other more common causes for open bites (such as tongue thrusting and thumb sucking) and likewise for deep bites.[61][62][63]

The upper or lower jaw can be overgrown (macrognathia) or undergrown (micrognathia).[62][61][63] It has been reported that patients with micrognathia are also affected by retrognathia (abnormal posterior positioning of the mandible or maxilla relative to the facial structure).[62]  These patients are majorly predisposed to a class II malocclusion. Mandibular macrognathia results in prognathism and predisposes patients to a class III malocclusion.[64]

Most malocclusion studies to date have focused on Class III malocclusions. Genetic studies for Class II and Class I malocclusion are more rare. An example of hereditary mandibular prognathism can be seen amongst the Hapsburg Royal family where one third of the affected individuals with severe class III malocclusion had one parent with a similar phenotype [65]

The frequent presentation of dental malocclusions in patients with craniofacial birth defects also supports a strong genetic aetiology. About 150 genes are associated with craniofacial conditions presenting with malocclusions.[66]  Micrognathia is a commonly recurring craniofacial birth defect appearing among multiple syndromes.

For patients with severe malocclusions, corrective jaw surgery or orthognathic surgery may be carried out as a part of overall treatment, which can be seen in about 5% of the general population.[62][61][63]

See also

[edit]
  • Crossbite
  • Elastics
  • Facemask (orthodontics)
  • Maximum intercuspation
  • Mouth breathing
  • Occlusion (dentistry)

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "malocclusion". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  2. ^ Bell B (September 1965). "Paul G. Spencer". American Journal of Orthodontics. 51 (9): 693–694. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(65)90262-9. PMID 14334001.
  3. ^ Gruenbaum T (2010). "Famous Figures in Dentistry". Mouth – JASDA. 30 (1): 18.
  4. ^ Hurt MA (2012). "Weedon D. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2010". Dermatology Practical & Conceptual. 2 (1): 79–82. doi:10.5826/dpc.0201a15. PMC 3997252.
  5. ^ Borzabadi-Farahani, A (2011). "An Overview of Selected Orthodontic Treatment Need Indices". In Naretto, Silvano (ed.). Principles in Contemporary Orthodontics. IntechOpen Limited. pp. 215–236. doi:10.5772/19735. ISBN 978-953-307-687-4.
  6. ^ "How genetics can affect your teeth". Orthodontics Australia. 2018-11-25. Retrieved 2020-11-16.
  7. ^ Corruccini RS, Potter RH (August 1980). "Genetic analysis of occlusal variation in twins". American Journal of Orthodontics. 78 (2): 140–54. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(80)90056-1. PMID 6931485.
  8. ^ Sarig, Rachel; Slon, Viviane; Abbas, Janan; May, Hila; Shpack, Nir; Vardimon, Alexander Dan; Hershkovitz, Israel (2013-11-20). "Malocclusion in Early Anatomically Modern Human: A Reflection on the Etiology of Modern Dental Misalignment". PLOS ONE. 8 (11): e80771. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...880771S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080771. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3835570. PMID 24278319.
  9. ^ Pajević, Tina; Juloski, Jovana; Glišić, Branislav (2019-08-29). "Malocclusion from the prehistoric to the medieval times in Serbian population: Dentoalveolar and skeletal relationship comparisons in samples". Homo: Internationale Zeitschrift für die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen. 70 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1127/homo/2019/1009. ISSN 1618-1301. PMID 31475289. S2CID 201203069.
  10. ^ Moimaz SA, Garbin AJ, Lima AM, Lolli LF, Saliba O, Garbin CA (August 2014). "Longitudinal study of habits leading to malocclusion development in childhood". BMC Oral Health. 14 (1): 96. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-14-96. PMC 4126276. PMID 25091288.
  11. ^ Klein ET (1952). "Pressure Habits, Etiological Factors in Malocclusion". Am. J. Orthod. 38 (8): 569–587. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(52)90025-0.
  12. ^ Graber TM. (1963). "The "Three m's": Muscles, Malformation and Malocclusion". Am. J. Orthod. 49 (6): 418–450. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90167-2. hdl:2027.42/32220. S2CID 57626540.
  13. ^ Björk A, Helm S (April 1967). "Prediction of the age of maximum puberal growth in body height" (PDF). The Angle Orthodontist. 37 (2): 134–43. PMID 4290545.
  14. ^ Brucker M (1943). "Studies on the Incidence and Cause of Dental Defects in Children: IV. Malocclusion" (PDF). J Dent Res. 22 (4): 315–321. doi:10.1177/00220345430220041201. S2CID 71368994.
  15. ^ Calisti LJ, Cohen MM, Fales MH (1960). "Correlation between malocclusion, oral habits, and socio-economic level of preschool children". Journal of Dental Research. 39 (3): 450–4. doi:10.1177/00220345600390030501. PMID 13806967. S2CID 39619434.
  16. ^ Subtelny JD, Subtelny JD (October 1973). "Oral habits--studies in form, function, and therapy". The Angle Orthodontist. 43 (4): 349–83. PMID 4583311.
  17. ^ Aznar T, Galán AF, Marín I, Domínguez A (May 2006). "Dental arch diameters and relationships to oral habits". The Angle Orthodontist. 76 (3): 441–5. PMID 16637724.
  18. ^ Yamaguchi H, Sueishi K (May 2003). "Malocclusion associated with abnormal posture". The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College. 44 (2): 43–54. doi:10.2209/tdcpublication.44.43. PMID 12956088.
  19. ^ Wellington M, Hall CB (February 2002). "Pacifier as a risk factor for acute otitis media". Pediatrics. 109 (2): 351–2, author reply 353. doi:10.1542/peds.109.2.351. PMID 11826228.
  20. ^ Rovers MM, Numans ME, Langenbach E, Grobbee DE, Verheij TJ, Schilder AG (August 2008). "Is pacifier use a risk factor for acute otitis media? A dynamic cohort study". Family Practice. 25 (4): 233–6. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn030. PMID 18562333.
  21. ^ Hamish T (1990). Occlusion. Parkins, B. J. (2nd ed.). London: Wright. ISBN 978-0723620754. OCLC 21226656.
  22. ^ Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, de Mayorga C (April 2001). "Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development". European Journal of Orthodontics. 23 (2): 153–67. doi:10.1093/ejo/23.2.153. PMID 11398553.
  23. ^ Borzabadi-Farahani A, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Eslamipour F (October 2009). "Malocclusion and occlusal traits in an urban Iranian population. An epidemiological study of 11- to 14-year-old children". European Journal of Orthodontics. 31 (5): 477–84. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp031. PMID 19477970.
  24. ^ "5 reasons you should see an orthodontist". Orthodontics Australia. 2017-09-27. Retrieved 2020-08-18.
  25. ^ a b c Oliver RG (December 2001). "An Introduction to Orthodontics, 2nd edn". Journal of Orthodontics. 28 (4): 320. doi:10.1093/ortho/28.4.320.
  26. ^ a b c Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM (February 2018). "Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (3): CD005972. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005972.pub4. PMC 6491166. PMID 29390172.
  27. ^ Brunelle JA, Bhat M, Lipton JA (February 1996). "Prevalence and distribution of selected occlusal characteristics in the US population, 1988-1991". Journal of Dental Research. 75 Spec No (2 Suppl): 706–13. doi:10.1177/002203459607502S10. PMID 8594094. S2CID 30447284.
  28. ^ de Castilho LS, Abreu MH, Pires e Souza LG, Romualdo LT, Souza e Silva ME, Resende VL (January 2018). "Factors associated with anterior open bite in children with developmental disabilities". Special Care in Dentistry. 38 (1): 46–50. doi:10.1111/scd.12262. PMID 29278267. S2CID 42747680.
  29. ^ Feres MF, Abreu LG, Insabralde NM, Almeida MR, Flores-Mir C (June 2016). "Effectiveness of the open bite treatment in growing children and adolescents. A systematic review". European Journal of Orthodontics. 38 (3): 237–50. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjv048. PMC 4914905. PMID 26136439.
  30. ^ a b Cambiano AO, Janson G, Lorenzoni DC, Garib DG, Dávalos DT (2018). "Nonsurgical treatment and stability of an adult with a severe anterior open-bite malocclusion". Journal of Orthodontic Science. 7: 2. doi:10.4103/jos.JOS_69_17. PMC 5952238. PMID 29765914.
  31. ^ Houston, W. J. B. (1992-02-01). "Book Reviews". The European Journal of Orthodontics. 14 (1): 69. doi:10.1093/ejo/14.1.69.
  32. ^ Hamdan AM, Lewis SM, Kelleher KE, Elhady SN, Lindauer SJ (November 2019). "Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?". The Angle Orthodontist. 89 (6): 847–854. doi:10.2319/030819-177.1. PMC 8109173. PMID 31306077.
  33. ^ "Angle's Classification of Malocclusion". Archived from the original on 2008-02-13. Retrieved 2007-10-31.
  34. ^ Sunil Kumar (Ed.): Orthodontics. New Delhi 2008, 624 p., ISBN 978-81-312-1054-3, p. 127
  35. ^ Sunil Kumar (Ed.): Orthodontics. New Delhi 2008, p. 123. A list of 18 approaches to modify or replace Angle's system is given here with further references at the end of the book.
  36. ^ Gurkeerat Singh: Textbook of Orthodontics, p. 163-170, with further references on p. 174.
  37. ^ a b c d Lieberman, D (May 2004). "Effects of food processing on masticatory strain and craniofacial growth in a retrognathic face". Journal of Human Evolution. 46 (6): 655–77. doi:10.1016/s0047-2484(04)00051-x. PMID 15183669.
  38. ^ a b Ingervall B, Bitsanis E (February 1987). "A pilot study of the effect of masticatory muscle training on facial growth in long-face children" (PDF). European Journal of Orthodontics. 9 (1): 15–23. doi:10.1093/ejo/9.1.15. PMID 3470182.
  39. ^ a b Rosenberg J (2010-02-22). "Malocclusion of teeth". Medline Plus. Retrieved 2012-02-06.
  40. ^ Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC (January 2016). "Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect". Lancet. 387 (10017): 475–90. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7. PMID 26869575.
  41. ^ Quaglio CL, de Freitas KM, de Freitas MR, Janson G, Henriques JF (June 2011). "Stability and relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 139 (6): 768–74. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.044. PMID 21640883.
  42. ^ a b "Dental Crowding: Causes and Treatment Options". Orthodontics Australia. 2020-06-29. Retrieved 2020-11-19.
  43. ^ "Malocclusion of teeth: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia". medlineplus.gov. Retrieved 2021-04-07.
  44. ^ "Can Buck Teeth Be Fixed? Causes & Treatment Options". Orthodontics Australia. 2021-07-01. Retrieved 2021-10-11.
  45. ^ a b Alam, MK (October 2018). "Treatment of Angle Class I malocclusion with severe crowding by extraction of four premolars: a case report". Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 17 (4): 683–687. doi:10.3329/bjms.v17i4.38339.
  46. ^ Persson M, Persson EC, Skagius S (August 1989). "Long-term spontaneous changes following removal of all first premolars in Class I cases with crowding". European Journal of Orthodontics. 11 (3): 271–82. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035995. PMID 2792216.
  47. ^ von Cramon-Taubadel N (December 2011). "Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (49): 19546–51. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10819546V. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113050108. PMC 3241821. PMID 22106280.
  48. ^ Nayak KU, Goyal V, Malviya N (October 2011). "Two-phase treatment of class II malocclusion in young growing patient". Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2 (4): 376–80. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.91808. PMC 3276872. PMID 22346172.
  49. ^ "Treatment of class ii malocclusions". 2013-11-14.
  50. ^ a b c Pinhasi R, Eshed V, von Cramon-Taubadel N (2015-02-04). "Incongruity between affinity patterns based on mandibular and lower dental dimensions following the transition to agriculture in the Near East, Anatolia and Europe". PLOS ONE. 10 (2): e0117301. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1017301P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117301. PMC 4317182. PMID 25651540.
  51. ^ a b c d Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, O'Brien KD (March 2018). "Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 (3): CD003452. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003452.pub4. PMC 6494411. PMID 29534303.
  52. ^ CLASSIFICATION OF SKELETAL AND DENTAL MALOCCLUSION: REVISITED; Mageet, Adil Osman (2016). "Classification of Skeletal and Dental Malocclusion: Revisited". Stomatology Edu Journal. 3 (2): 205–211. doi:10.25241/2016.3(2).11.
  53. ^ Esthetics and biomechanics in orthodontics. Nanda, Ravindra,, Preceded by (work): Nanda, Ravindra. (Second ed.). St. Louis, Missouri. 2014-04-10. ISBN 978-0-323-22659-2. OCLC 880707123.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
  54. ^ Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A, Sheikholaemmeh F, Grassia V, Jamilian A (August 2018). "Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics". Progress in Orthodontics. 19 (1): 28. doi:10.1186/s40510-018-0218-0. PMC 6070451. PMID 30069814.
  55. ^ a b Uner O, Yüksel S, Uçüncü N (April 1995). "Long-term evaluation after chincap treatment". European Journal of Orthodontics. 17 (2): 135–41. doi:10.1093/ejo/17.2.135. PMID 7781722.
  56. ^ Ravi MS, Shetty NK, Prasad RB (January 2012). "Orthodontics-surgical combination therapy for Class III skeletal malocclusion". Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 3 (1): 78–82. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.94552. PMC 3341765. PMID 22557903.
  57. ^ Borzabadi Farahani A, Olkun HK, Eslamian L, Eslamipour F (2024). "A retrospective investigation of orthognathic patients and functional needs". Australasian Orthodontic Journal. 40: 111–120. doi:10.2478/aoj-2024-0013.
  58. ^ a b Atsawasuwan P, Hohlt W, Evans CA (April 2015). "Nonsurgical approach to Class I open-bite malocclusion with extrusion mechanics: a 3-year retention case report". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 147 (4): 499–508. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.024. PMID 25836010.
  59. ^ a b Grauer D, Heymann GC, Swift EJ (June 2012). "Clinical management of tooth size discrepancies". Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 24 (3): 155–9. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00520.x. PMID 22691075. S2CID 11482185.
  60. ^ a b Cançado RH, Gonçalves Júnior W, Valarelli FP, Freitas KM, Crêspo JA (2015). "Association between Bolton discrepancy and Angle malocclusions". Brazilian Oral Research. 29: 1–6. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0116. PMID 26486769.
  61. ^ a b c Harrington C, Gallagher JR, Borzabadi-Farahani A (July 2015). "A retrospective analysis of dentofacial deformities and orthognathic surgeries using the index of orthognathic functional treatment need (IOFTN)". International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 79 (7): 1063–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.04.027. PMID 25957779.
  62. ^ a b c d Posnick JC (September 2013). "Definition and Prevalence of Dentofacial Deformities". Orthognatic Surgery: Principles and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 61–68. doi:10.1016/B978-1-4557-2698-1.00003-4. ISBN 978-145572698-1.
  63. ^ a b c Borzabadi-Farahani A, Eslamipour F, Shahmoradi M (June 2016). "Functional needs of subjects with dentofacial deformities: A study using the index of orthognathic functional treatment need (IOFTN)". Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 69 (6): 796–801. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.03.008. PMID 27068664.
  64. ^ Purkait, S (2011). Essentials of Oral Pathology 4th Edition.
  65. ^ Joshi N, Hamdan AM, Fakhouri WD (December 2014). "Skeletal malocclusion: a developmental disorder with a life-long morbidity". Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 6 (6): 399–408. doi:10.14740/jocmr1905w. PMC 4169080. PMID 25247012.
  66. ^ Moreno Uribe LM, Miller SF (April 2015). "Genetics of the dentofacial variation in human malocclusion". Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 18 Suppl 1 (S1): 91–9. doi:10.1111/ocr.12083. PMC 4418210. PMID 25865537.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Peter S. Ungar, "The Trouble with Teeth: Our teeth are crowded, crooked and riddled with cavities. It hasn't always been this way", Scientific American, vol. 322, no. 4 (April 2020), pp. 44–49. "Our teeth [...] evolved over hundreds of millions of years to be incredibly strong and to align precisely for efficient chewing. [...] Our dental disorders largely stem from a shift in the oral environment caused by the introduction of softer, more sugary foods than the ones our ancestors typically ate."
[edit]

 

Orthodontics
Connecting the arch-wire on brackets with wire
Occupation
Names Orthodontist
Occupation type
Specialty
Activity sectors
Dentistry
Description
Education required
Dental degree, specialty training
Fields of
employment
Private practices, hospitals

Orthodontics[a][b] is a dentistry specialty that addresses the diagnosis, prevention, management, and correction of mal-positioned teeth and jaws, as well as misaligned bite patterns.[2] It may also address the modification of facial growth, known as dentofacial orthopedics.

Abnormal alignment of the teeth and jaws is very common. The approximate worldwide prevalence of malocclusion was as high as 56%.[3] However, conclusive scientific evidence for the health benefits of orthodontic treatment is lacking, although patients with completed treatment have reported a higher quality of life than that of untreated patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.[4][5] The main reason for the prevalence of these malocclusions is diets with less fresh fruit and vegetables and overall softer foods in childhood, causing smaller jaws with less room for the teeth to erupt.[6] Treatment may require several months to a few years and entails using dental braces and other appliances to gradually adjust tooth position and jaw alignment. In cases where the malocclusion is severe, jaw surgery may be incorporated into the treatment plan. Treatment usually begins before a person reaches adulthood, insofar as pre-adult bones may be adjusted more easily before adulthood.

History

[edit]

Though it was rare until the Industrial Revolution,[7] there is evidence of the issue of overcrowded, irregular, and protruding teeth afflicting individuals. Evidence from Greek and Etruscan materials suggests that attempts to treat this disorder date back to 1000 BC, showcasing primitive yet impressively well-crafted orthodontic appliances. In the 18th and 19th centuries, a range of devices for the "regulation" of teeth were described by various dentistry authors who occasionally put them into practice.[8] As a modern science, orthodontics dates back to the mid-1800s.[9] The field's influential contributors include Norman William Kingsley[9] (1829–1913) and Edward Angle[10] (1855–1930). Angle created the first basic system for classifying malocclusions, a system that remains in use today.[9]

Beginning in the mid-1800s, Norman Kingsley published Oral Deformities, which is now credited as one of the first works to begin systematically documenting orthodontics. Being a major presence in American dentistry during the latter half of the 19th century, not only was Kingsley one of the early users of extraoral force to correct protruding teeth, but he was also one of the pioneers for treating cleft palates and associated issues. During the era of orthodontics under Kingsley and his colleagues, the treatment was focused on straightening teeth and creating facial harmony. Ignoring occlusal relationships, it was typical to remove teeth for a variety of dental issues, such as malalignment or overcrowding. The concept of an intact dentition was not widely appreciated in those days, making bite correlations seem irrelevant.[8]

In the late 1800s, the concept of occlusion was essential for creating reliable prosthetic replacement teeth. This idea was further refined and ultimately applied in various ways when dealing with healthy dental structures as well. As these concepts of prosthetic occlusion progressed, it became an invaluable tool for dentistry.[8]

It was in 1890 that the work and impact of Dr. Edwards H. Angle began to be felt, with his contribution to modern orthodontics particularly noteworthy. Initially focused on prosthodontics, he taught in Pennsylvania and Minnesota before directing his attention towards dental occlusion and the treatments needed to maintain it as a normal condition, thus becoming known as the "father of modern orthodontics".[8]

By the beginning of the 20th century, orthodontics had become more than just the straightening of crooked teeth. The concept of ideal occlusion, as postulated by Angle and incorporated into a classification system, enabled a shift towards treating malocclusion, which is any deviation from normal occlusion.[8] Having a full set of teeth on both arches was highly sought after in orthodontic treatment due to the need for exact relationships between them. Extraction as an orthodontic procedure was heavily opposed by Angle and those who followed him. As occlusion became the key priority, facial proportions and aesthetics were neglected. To achieve ideal occlusals without using external forces, Angle postulated that having perfect occlusion was the best way to gain optimum facial aesthetics.[8]

With the passing of time, it became quite evident that even an exceptional occlusion was not suitable when considered from an aesthetic point of view. Not only were there issues related to aesthetics, but it usually proved impossible to keep a precise occlusal relationship achieved by forcing teeth together over extended durations with the use of robust elastics, something Angle and his students had previously suggested. Charles Tweed[11] in America and Raymond Begg[12] in Australia (who both studied under Angle) re-introduced dentistry extraction into orthodontics during the 1940s and 1950s so they could improve facial esthetics while also ensuring better stability concerning occlusal relationships.[13]

In the postwar period, cephalometric radiography[14] started to be used by orthodontists for measuring changes in tooth and jaw position caused by growth and treatment.[15] The x-rays showed that many Class II and III malocclusions were due to improper jaw relations as opposed to misaligned teeth. It became evident that orthodontic therapy could adjust mandibular development, leading to the formation of functional jaw orthopedics in Europe and extraoral force measures in the US. These days, both functional appliances and extraoral devices are applied around the globe with the aim of amending growth patterns and forms. Consequently, pursuing true, or at least improved, jaw relationships had become the main objective of treatment by the mid-20th century.[8]

At the beginning of the twentieth century, orthodontics was in need of an upgrade. The American Journal of Orthodontics was created for this purpose in 1915; before it, there were no scientific objectives to follow, nor any precise classification system and brackets that lacked features.[16]

Until the mid-1970s, braces were made by wrapping metal around each tooth.[9] With advancements in adhesives, it became possible to instead bond metal brackets to the teeth.[9]

In 1972, Lawrence F. Andrews gave an insightful definition of the ideal occlusion in permanent teeth. This has had meaningful effects on orthodontic treatments that are administered regularly,[16] and these are: 1. Correct interarchal relationships 2. Correct crown angulation (tip) 3. Correct crown inclination (torque) 4. No rotations 5. Tight contact points 6. Flat Curve of Spee (0.0–2.5 mm),[17] and based on these principles, he discovered a treatment system called the straight-wire appliance system, or the pre-adjusted edgewise system. Introduced in 1976, Larry Andrews' pre-adjusted edgewise appliance, more commonly known as the straight wire appliance, has since revolutionized fixed orthodontic treatment. The advantage of the design lies in its bracket and archwire combination, which requires only minimal wire bending from the orthodontist or clinician. It's aptly named after this feature: the angle of the slot and thickness of the bracket base ultimately determine where each tooth is situated with little need for extra manipulation.[18][19][20]

Prior to the invention of a straight wire appliance, orthodontists were utilizing a non-programmed standard edgewise fixed appliance system, or Begg's pin and tube system. Both of these systems employed identical brackets for each tooth and necessitated the bending of an archwire in three planes for locating teeth in their desired positions, with these bends dictating ultimate placements.[18]

Evolution of the current orthodontic appliances

[edit]

When it comes to orthodontic appliances, they are divided into two types: removable and fixed. Removable appliances can be taken on and off by the patient as required. On the other hand, fixed appliances cannot be taken off as they remain bonded to the teeth during treatment.

Fixed appliances

[edit]

Fixed orthodontic appliances are predominantly derived from the edgewise appliance approach, which typically begins with round wires before transitioning to rectangular archwires for improving tooth alignment. These rectangluar wires promote precision in the positioning of teeth following initial treatment. In contrast to the Begg appliance, which was based solely on round wires and auxiliary springs, the Tip-Edge system emerged in the early 21st century. This innovative technology allowed for the utilization of rectangular archwires to precisely control tooth movement during the finishing stages after initial treatment with round wires. Thus, almost all modern fixed appliances can be considered variations on this edgewise appliance system.

Early 20th-century orthodontist Edward Angle made a major contribution to the world of dentistry. He created four distinct appliance systems that have been used as the basis for many orthodontic treatments today, barring a few exceptions. They are E-arch, pin and tube, ribbon arch, and edgewise systems.

E-arch

[edit]

Edward H. Angle made a significant contribution to the dental field when he released the 7th edition of his book in 1907, which outlined his theories and detailed his technique. This approach was founded upon the iconic "E-Arch" or 'the-arch' shape as well as inter-maxillary elastics.[21] This device was different from any other appliance of its period as it featured a rigid framework to which teeth could be tied effectively in order to recreate an arch form that followed pre-defined dimensions.[22] Molars were fitted with braces, and a powerful labial archwire was positioned around the arch. The wire ended in a thread, and to move it forward, an adjustable nut was used, which allowed for an increase in circumference. By ligation, each individual tooth was attached to this expansive archwire.[8]

Pin and tube appliance

[edit]

Due to its limited range of motion, Angle was unable to achieve precise tooth positioning with an E-arch. In order to bypass this issue, he started using bands on other teeth combined with a vertical tube for each individual tooth. These tubes held a soldered pin, which could be repositioned at each appointment in order to move them in place.[8] Dubbed the "bone-growing appliance", this contraption was theorized to encourage healthier bone growth due to its potential for transferring force directly to the roots.[23] However, implementing it proved troublesome in reality.

Ribbon arch

[edit]

Realizing that the pin and tube appliance was not easy to control, Angle developed a better option, the ribbon arch, which was much simpler to use. Most of its components were already prepared by the manufacturer, so it was significantly easier to manage than before. In order to attach the ribbon arch, the occlusal area of the bracket was opened. Brackets were only added to eight incisors and mandibular canines, as it would be impossible to insert the arch into both horizontal molar tubes and the vertical brackets of adjacent premolars. This lack of understanding posed a considerable challenge to dental professionals; they were unable to make corrections to an excessive Spee curve in bicuspid teeth.[24] Despite the complexity of the situation, it was necessary for practitioners to find a resolution. Unparalleled to its counterparts, what made the ribbon arch instantly popular was that its archwire had remarkable spring qualities and could be utilized to accurately align teeth that were misaligned. However, a major drawback of this device was its inability to effectively control root position since it did not have enough resilience to generate the torque movements required for setting roots in their new place.[8]

Edgewise appliance

[edit]

In an effort to rectify the issues with the ribbon arch, Angle shifted the orientation of its slot from vertical, instead making it horizontal. In addition, he swapped out the wire and replaced it with a precious metal wire that was rotated by 90 degrees in relation—henceforth known as Edgewise.[25] Following extensive trials, it was concluded that dimensions of 22 × 28 mils were optimal for obtaining excellent control over crown and root positioning across all three planes of space.[26] After debuting in 1928, this appliance quickly became one of the mainstays for multibanded fixed therapy, although ribbon arches continued to be utilized for another decade or so beyond this point too.[8]

Labiolingual

[edit]

Prior to Angle, the idea of fitting attachments on individual teeth had not been thought of, and in his lifetime, his concern for precisely positioning each tooth was not highly appraised. In addition to using fingersprings for repositioning teeth with a range of removable devices, two main appliance systems were very popular in the early part of the 20th century. Labiolingual appliances use bands on the first molars joined with heavy lingual and labial archwires affixed with soldered fingersprings to shift single teeth.

Twin wire

[edit]

Utilizing bands around both incisors and molars, a twin-wire appliance was designed to provide alignment between these teeth. Constructed with two 10-mil steel archwires, its delicate features were safeguarded by lengthy tubes stretching from molars towards canines. Despite its efforts, it had limited capacity for movement without further modifications, rendering it obsolete in modern orthodontic practice.

Begg's Appliance

[edit]

Returning to Australia in the 1920s, the renowned orthodontist, Raymond Begg, applied his knowledge of ribbon arch appliances, which he had learned from the Angle School. On top of this, Begg recognized that extracting teeth was sometimes vital for successful outcomes and sought to modify the ribbon arch appliance to provide more control when dealing with root positioning. In the late 1930s, Begg developed his adaptation of the appliance, which took three forms. Firstly, a high-strength 16-mil round stainless steel wire replaced the original precious metal ribbon arch. Secondly, he kept the same ribbon arch bracket but inverted it so that it pointed toward the gums instead of away from them. Lastly, auxiliary springs were added to control root movement. This resulted in what would come to be known as the Begg Appliance. With this design, friction was decreased since contact between wire and bracket was minimal, and binding was minimized due to tipping and uprighting being used for anchorage control, which lessened contact angles between wires and corners of the bracket.

Tip-Edge System

[edit]

Begg's influence is still seen in modern appliances, such as Tip-Edge brackets. This type of bracket incorporates a rectangular slot cutaway on one side to allow for crown tipping with no incisal deflection of an archwire, allowing teeth to be tipped during space closure and then uprighted through auxiliary springs or even a rectangular wire for torque purposes in finishing. At the initial stages of treatment, small-diameter steel archwires should be used when working with Tip-Edge brackets.

Contemporary edgewise systems

[edit]

Throughout time, there has been a shift in which appliances are favored by dentists. In particular, during the 1960s, when it was introduced, the Begg appliance gained wide popularity due to its efficiency compared to edgewise appliances of that era; it could produce the same results with less investment on the dentist's part. Nevertheless, since then, there have been advances in technology and sophistication in edgewise appliances, which led to the opposite conclusion: nowadays, edgewise appliances are more efficient than the Begg appliance, thus explaining why it is commonly used.

Automatic rotational control

[edit]

At the beginning, Angle attached eyelets to the edges of archwires so that they could be held with ligatures and help manage rotations. Now, however, no extra ligature is needed due to either twin brackets or single brackets that have added wings touching underneath the wire (Lewis or Lang brackets). Both types of brackets simplify the process of obtaining moments that control movements along a particular plane of space.

Alteration in bracket slot dimensions

[edit]

In modern dentistry, two types of edgewise appliances exist: the 18- and 22-slot varieties. While these appliances are used differently, the introduction of a 20-slot device with more precise features has been considered but not pursued yet.[27]

Straight-wire bracket prescriptions

[edit]

Rather than rely on the same bracket for all teeth, L.F. Andrews found a way to make different brackets for each tooth in the 1980s, thanks to the increased convenience of bonding.[28] This adjustment enabled him to avoid having multiple bends in archwires that would have been needed to make up for variations in tooth anatomy. Ultimately, this led to what was termed a "straight-wire appliance" system – an edgewise appliance that greatly enhanced its efficiency.[29] The modern edgewise appliance has slightly different construction than the original one. Instead of relying on faciolingual bends to accommodate variations among teeth, each bracket has a correspondingly varying base thickness depending on the tooth it is intended for. However, due to individual differences between teeth, this does not completely eliminate the need for compensating bends.[30] Accurately placing the roots of many teeth requires angling brackets in relation to the long axis of the tooth. Traditionally, this mesiodistal root positioning necessitated using second-order, or tip, bends along the archwire. However, angling the bracket or bracket slot eliminates this need for bends.

Given the discrepancies in inclination of facial surfaces across individual teeth, placing a twist, otherwise known as third-order or torque bends, into segments of each rectangular archwire was initially required with the edgewise appliance. These bends were necessary for all patients and wires, not just to avoid any unintentional movement of suitably placed teeth or when moving roots facially or lingually. Angulation of either brackets or slots can minimize the need for second-order or tip bends on archwires. Contemporary edgewise appliances come with brackets designed to adjust for any facial inclinations, thereby eliminating or reducing any third-order bends. These brackets already have angulation and torque values built in so that each rectangluar archwire can be contorted to form a custom fit without inadvertently shifting any correctly positioned teeth. Without bracket angulation and torque, second-order or tip bends would still be required on each patient's archwire.

Methods

[edit]
Upper and lower jaw functional expanders

A typical treatment for incorrectly positioned teeth (malocclusion) takes from one to two years, with braces being adjusted every four to 10 weeks by orthodontists,[31] while university-trained dental specialists are versed in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of dental and facial irregularities. Orthodontists offer a wide range of treatment options to straighten crooked teeth, fix irregular bites, and align the jaws correctly.[32] There are many ways to adjust malocclusion. In growing patients, there are more options to treat skeletal discrepancies, either by promoting or restricting growth using functional appliances, orthodontic headgear, or a reverse pull facemask. Most orthodontic work begins in the early permanent dentition stage before skeletal growth is completed. If skeletal growth has completed, jaw surgery is an option. Sometimes teeth are extracted to aid the orthodontic treatment (teeth are extracted in about half of all the cases, most commonly the premolars).[33]

Orthodontic therapy may include the use of fixed or removable appliances. Most orthodontic therapy is delivered using appliances that are fixed in place,[34] for example, braces that are adhesively bonded to the teeth. Fixed appliances may provide greater mechanical control of the teeth; optimal treatment outcomes are improved by using fixed appliances.

Fixed appliances may be used, for example, to rotate teeth if they do not fit the arch shape of the other teeth in the mouth, to adjust multiple teeth to different places, to change the tooth angle of teeth, or to change the position of a tooth's root. This treatment course is not preferred where a patient has poor oral hygiene, as decalcification, tooth decay, or other complications may result. If a patient is unmotivated (insofar as treatment takes several months and requires commitment to oral hygiene), or if malocclusions are mild.

The biology of tooth movement and how advances in gene therapy and molecular biology technology may shape the future of orthodontic treatment.[35]

Braces

[edit]
Dental braces

Braces are usually placed on the front side of the teeth, but they may also be placed on the side facing the tongue (called lingual braces). Brackets made out of stainless steel or porcelain are bonded to the center of the teeth using an adhesive. Wires are placed in a slot in the brackets, which allows for controlled movement in all three dimensions.

Apart from wires, forces can be applied using elastic bands,[36] and springs may be used to push teeth apart or to close a gap. Several teeth may be tied together with ligatures, and different kinds of hooks can be placed to allow for connecting an elastic band.[37][36]

Clear aligners are an alternative to braces, but insufficient evidence exists to determine their effectiveness.[38]

Treatment duration

[edit]

The time required for braces varies from person to person as it depends on the severity of the problem, the amount of room available, the distance the teeth must travel, the health of the teeth, gums, and supporting bone, and how closely the patient follows instructions. On average, however, once the braces are put on, they usually remain in place for one to three years. After braces are removed, most patients will need to wear a retainer all the time for the first six months, then only during sleep for many years.[39]

Headgear

[edit]

Orthodontic headgear, sometimes referred to as an "extra-oral appliance", is a treatment approach that requires the patient to have a device strapped onto their head to help correct malocclusion—typically used when the teeth do not align properly. Headgear is most often used along with braces or other orthodontic appliances. While braces correct the position of teeth, orthodontic headgear—which, as the name suggests, is worn on or strapped onto the patient's head—is most often added to orthodontic treatment to help alter the alignment of the jaw, although there are some situations in which such an appliance can help move teeth, particularly molars.

Full orthodontic headgear with headcap, fitting straps, facebow, and elastics

Whatever the purpose, orthodontic headgear works by exerting tension on the braces via hooks, a facebow, coils, elastic bands, metal orthodontic bands, and other attachable appliances directly into the patient's mouth. It is most effective for children and teenagers because their jaws are still developing and can be easily manipulated. (If an adult is fitted with headgear, it is usually to help correct the position of teeth that have shifted after other teeth have been extracted.) Thus, headgear is typically used to treat a number of jaw alignment or bite problems, such as overbite and underbite.[40]

Palatal expansion

[edit]

Palatal expansion can be best achieved using a fixed tissue-borne appliance. Removable appliances can push teeth outward but are less effective at maxillary sutural expansion. The effects of a removable expander may look the same as they push teeth outward, but they should not be confused with actually expanding the palate. Proper palate expansion can create more space for teeth as well as improve both oral and nasal airflow.[41]

Jaw surgery

[edit]

Jaw surgery may be required to fix severe malocclusions.[42] The bone is broken during surgery and stabilized with titanium (or bioresorbable) plates and screws to allow for healing to take place.[43] After surgery, regular orthodontic treatment is used to move the teeth into their final position.[44]

During treatment

[edit]

To reduce pain during the orthodontic treatment, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), vibratory devices, chewing adjuncts, brainwave music, or cognitive behavioral therapy can be used. However, the supporting evidence is of low quality, and the results are inconclusive.[45]

Post treatment

[edit]

After orthodontic treatment has been completed, there is a tendency for teeth to return, or relapse, back to their pre-treatment positions. Over 50% of patients have some reversion to pre-treatment positions within 10 years following treatment.[46] To prevent relapse, the majority of patients will be offered a retainer once treatment has been completed and will benefit from wearing their retainers. Retainers can be either fixed or removable.

Removable retainers

[edit]

Removable retainers are made from clear plastic, and they are custom-fitted for the patient's mouth. It has a tight fit and holds all of the teeth in position. There are many types of brands for clear retainers, including Zendura Retainer, Essix Retainer, and Vivera Retainer.[47] A Hawley retainer is also a removable orthodontic appliance made from a combination of plastic and metal that is custom-molded to fit the patient's mouth. Removable retainers will be worn for different periods of time, depending on the patient's need to stabilize the dentition.[48]

Fixed retainers

[edit]

Fixed retainers are a simple wire fixed to the tongue-facing part of the incisors using dental adhesive and can be specifically useful to prevent rotation in incisors. Other types of fixed retainers can include labial or lingual braces, with brackets fixed to the teeth.[48]

Clear aligners

[edit]

Clear aligners are another form of orthodontics commonly used today, involving removable plastic trays. There has been controversy about the effectiveness of aligners such as Invisalign or Byte; some consider them to be faster and more freeing than the alternatives.[49]

Training

[edit]

There are several specialty areas in dentistry, but the specialty of orthodontics was the first to be recognized within dentistry.[50] Specifically, the American Dental Association recognized orthodontics as a specialty in the 1950s.[50] Each country has its own system for training and registering orthodontic specialists.

Australia

[edit]

In Australia, to obtain an accredited three-year full-time university degree in orthodontics, one will need to be a qualified dentist (complete an AHPRA-registered general dental degree) with a minimum of two years of clinical experience. There are several universities in Australia that offer orthodontic programs: the University of Adelaide, the University of Melbourne, the University of Sydney, the University of Queensland, the University of Western Australia, and the University of Otago.[51] Orthodontic courses are accredited by the Australian Dental Council and reviewed by the Australian Society of Orthodontists (ASO). Prospective applicants should obtain information from the relevant institution before applying for admission.[52] After completing a degree in orthodontics, specialists are required to be registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) in order to practice.[53][54]

Bangladesh

[edit]

Dhaka Dental College in Bangladesh is one of the many schools recognized by the Bangladesh Medical and Dental Council (BM&DC) that offer post-graduation orthodontic courses.[55][56] Before applying to any post-graduation training courses, an applicant must have completed the Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) examination from any dental college.[55] After application, the applicant must take an admissions test held by the specific college.[55] If successful, selected candidates undergo training for six months.[57]

Canada

[edit]

In Canada, obtaining a dental degree, such as a Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) or Doctor of Medical Dentistry (DMD), would be required before being accepted by a school for orthodontic training.[58] Currently, there are 10 schools in the country offering the orthodontic specialty.[58] Candidates should contact the individual school directly to obtain the most recent pre-requisites before entry.[58] The Canadian Dental Association expects orthodontists to complete at least two years of post-doctoral, specialty training in orthodontics in an accredited program after graduating from their dental degree.

United States

[edit]

Similar to Canada, there are several colleges and universities in the United States that offer orthodontic programs. Every school has a different enrollment process, but every applicant is required to have graduated with a DDS or DMD from an accredited dental school.[59][60] Entrance into an accredited orthodontics program is extremely competitive and begins by passing a national or state licensing exam.[61]

The program generally lasts for two to three years, and by the final year, graduates are required to complete the written American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) exam.[61] This exam is also broken down into two components: a written exam and a clinical exam.[61] The written exam is a comprehensive exam that tests for the applicant's knowledge of basic sciences and clinical concepts.[61] The clinical exam, however, consists of a Board Case Oral Examination (BCOE), a Case Report Examination (CRE), and a Case Report Oral Examination (CROE).[61] Once certified, certification must then be renewed every ten years.[61] Orthodontic programs can award a Master of Science degree, a Doctor of Science degree, or a Doctor of Philosophy degree, depending on the school and individual research requirements.[62]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Throughout the United Kingdom, there are several Orthodontic Specialty Training Registrar posts available.[63] The program is full-time for three years, and upon completion, trainees graduate with a degree at the Masters or Doctorate level.[63] Training may take place within hospital departments that are linked to recognized dental schools.[63] Obtaining a Certificate of Completion of Specialty Training (CCST) allows an orthodontic specialist to be registered under the General Dental Council (GDC).[63] An orthodontic specialist can provide care within a primary care setting, but to work at a hospital as an orthodontic consultant, higher-level training is further required as a post-CCST trainee.[63] To work within a university setting as an academic consultant, completing research toward obtaining a Ph.D. is also required.[63]

See also

[edit]
  • Orthodontic technology
  • Orthodontic indices
  • List of orthodontic functional appliances
  • Molar distalization
  • Mouth breathing
  • Obligate nasal breathing

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Also referred to as orthodontia
  2. ^ "Orthodontics" comes from the Greek orthos ('correct, straight') and -odont- ('tooth').[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Definition of orthodontics | Dictionary.com". www.dictionary.com. Retrieved 2019-08-28.
  2. ^ "What is orthodontics?// Useful Resources: FAQ and Downloadable eBooks". Orthodontics Australia. Retrieved 2020-08-13.
  3. ^ Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, Pagano S, Barilotti C, Paglia L, Colombo S, Orso M, Cianetti S (June 2020). "Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Eur J Paediatr Dent. 21 (2): 115–22. doi:10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.05. PMID 32567942.
  4. ^ Whitcomb I (2020-07-20). "Evidence and Orthodontics: Does Your Child Really Need Braces?". Undark Magazine. Retrieved 2020-07-27.
  5. ^ "Controversial report finds no proof that dental braces work". British Dental Journal. 226 (2): 91. 2019-01-01. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.65. ISSN 1476-5373. S2CID 59222957.
  6. ^ von Cramon-Taubadel N (December 2011). "Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (49): 19546–19551. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10819546V. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113050108. PMC 3241821. PMID 22106280.
  7. ^ Rose, Jerome C.; Roblee, Richard D. (June 2009). "Origins of dental crowding and malocclusions: an anthropological perspective". Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J.: 1995). 30 (5): 292–300. ISSN 1548-8578. PMID 19514263.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM (2019). Contemporary orthodontics (Sixth ed.). Philadelphia, PA. ISBN 978-0-323-54387-3. OCLC 1089435881.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  9. ^ a b c d e "A Brief History of Orthodontic Braces – ArchWired". www.archwired.com. 17 July 2019.[self-published source]
  10. ^ Peck S (November 2009). "A biographical portrait of Edward Hartley Angle, the first specialist in orthodontics, part 1". The Angle Orthodontist. 79 (6): 1021–1027. doi:10.2319/021009-93.1. PMID 19852589.
  11. ^ "The Application of the Principles of the Edge- wise Arch in the Treatment of Malocclusions: II.*". meridian.allenpress.com. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  12. ^ "British Orthodontic Society > Museum and Archive > Collection > Fixed Appliances > Begg". www.bos.org.uk. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  13. ^ Safirstein D (August 2015). "P. Raymond Begg". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 148 (2): 206. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.005. PMID 26232825.
  14. ^ Higley LB (August 1940). "Lateral head roentgenograms and their relation to the orthodontic problem". American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery. 26 (8): 768–778. doi:10.1016/S0096-6347(40)90331-3. ISSN 0096-6347.
  15. ^ Themes UF (2015-01-12). "14: Cephalometric radiography". Pocket Dentistry. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  16. ^ a b Andrews LF (December 2015). "The 6-elements orthodontic philosophy: Treatment goals, classification, and rules for treating". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 148 (6): 883–887. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.011. PMID 26672688.
  17. ^ Andrews LF (September 1972). "The six keys to normal occlusion". American Journal of Orthodontics. 62 (3): 296–309. doi:10.1016/s0002-9416(72)90268-0. PMID 4505873. S2CID 8039883.
  18. ^ a b Themes UF (2015-01-01). "31 The straight wire appliance". Pocket Dentistry. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  19. ^ Andrews LF (July 1979). "The straight-wire appliance". British Journal of Orthodontics. 6 (3): 125–143. doi:10.1179/bjo.6.3.125. PMID 297458. S2CID 33259729.
  20. ^ Phulari B (2013), "Andrews' Straight Wire Appliance", History of Orthodontics, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., p. 98, doi:10.5005/jp/books/12065_11, ISBN 9789350904718, retrieved 2023-02-07
  21. ^ Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7th éd. Philadelphia: S.S.White Dental Mfg Cy, 1907
  22. ^ Philippe J (March 2008). "How, why, and when was the edgewise appliance born?". Journal of Dentofacial Anomalies and Orthodontics. 11 (1): 68–74. doi:10.1051/odfen/20084210113. ISSN 2110-5715.
  23. ^ Angle EH (1912). "Evolution of orthodontia. Recent developments". Dental Cosmos. 54: 853–867.
  24. ^ Brodie AG (1931). "A discussion on the Newest Angle Mechanism". The Angle Orthodontist. 1: 32–38.
  25. ^ Angle EH (1928). "The latest and best in Orthodontic Mechanism". Dental Cosmos. 70: 1143–1156.
  26. ^ Brodie AG (1956). "Orthodontic Concepts Prior to the Death of Edward Angle". The Angle Orthodontist. 26: 144–155.
  27. ^ Matasa CG, Graber TM (April 2000). "Angle, the innovator, mechanical genius, and clinician". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 117 (4): 444–452. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70164-8. PMID 10756270.
  28. ^ Andrews LF. Straight Wire: The Concept and Appliance. San Diego: LA Wells; 1989.
  29. ^ Andrews LF (1989). Straight wire: the concept and appliance. Lisa Schirmer. San Diego, CA. ISBN 978-0-9616256-0-3. OCLC 22808470.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  30. ^ Roth RH (November 1976). "Five year clinical evaluation of the Andrews straight-wire appliance". Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 10 (11): 836–50. PMID 1069735.
  31. ^ Fleming PS, Fedorowicz Z, Johal A, El-Angbawi A, Pandis N, et al. (The Cochrane Collaboration) (June 2015). "Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015 (6). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: CD010572. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010572. PMC 6464946. PMID 26123284.
  32. ^ "What is an Orthodontist?". Orthodontics Australia. 5 December 2019.
  33. ^ Dardengo C, Fernandes LQ, Capelli Júnior J (February 2016). "Frequency of orthodontic extraction". Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 21 (1): 54–59. doi:10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.054-059.oar. PMC 4816586. PMID 27007762.
  34. ^ "Child Dental Health Survey 2013, England, Wales and Northern Ireland". digital.nhs.uk. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
  35. ^ Atsawasuwan P, Shirazi S (2019-04-10). "Advances in Orthodontic Tooth Movement: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology Aspect". In Aslan BI, Uzuner FD (eds.). Current Approaches in Orthodontics. IntechOpen. doi:10.5772/intechopen.80287. ISBN 978-1-78985-181-6. Retrieved 2021-05-16.
  36. ^ a b "Elastics For Braces: Rubber Bands in Orthodontics". Orthodontics Australia. 2019-12-15. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  37. ^ Mitchell L (2013). An Introduction to Orthodontics. Oxford Medical Publications. pp. 220–233.
  38. ^ Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL (September 2015). "Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review". The Angle Orthodontist. 85 (5): 881–889. doi:10.2319/061614-436.1. PMC 8610387. PMID 25412265. S2CID 10787375. The quality level of the studies was not sufficient to draw any evidence-based conclusions.
  39. ^ "Dental Braces and Retainers".
  40. ^ Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM (February 2018). "Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2): CD005972. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub4. PMC 6491166. PMID 29390172.
  41. ^ "Palate Expander". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved October 29, 2024.
  42. ^ "Jaw Surgery". Modern Orthodontic Clinic in Sammamish & Bellevue. Retrieved 2024-10-03.
  43. ^ Agnihotry A, Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Gill KS, et al. (The Cochrane Collaboration) (October 2017). Zbigniew F (ed.). "Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 10 (10). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: CD006204. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006204. PMC 6485457. PMID 28977689.
  44. ^ "British Orthodontic Society > Public & Patients > Your Jaw Surgery". www.bos.org.uk. Retrieved 2019-08-28.
  45. ^ Fleming PS, Strydom H, Katsaros C, MacDonald L, Curatolo M, Fudalej P, Pandis N, et al. (Cochrane Oral Health Group) (December 2016). "Non-pharmacological interventions for alleviating pain during orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016 (12): CD010263. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010263.pub2. PMC 6463902. PMID 28009052.
  46. ^ Yu Y, Sun J, Lai W, Wu T, Koshy S, Shi Z (September 2013). "Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (9): CD008734. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008734.pub2. PMC 10793711. PMID 24014170.
  47. ^ "Clear Retainers | Maintain Your Hard to Get Smile with Clear Retainers". Retrieved 2020-01-13.
  48. ^ a b Martin C, Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn D, Worthington HV, Limones A (May 2023). "Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023 (5): CD002283. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5. PMC 10202160. PMID 37219527.
  49. ^ Putrino A, Barbato E, Galluccio G (March 2021). "Clear Aligners: Between Evolution and Efficiency-A Scoping Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18 (6): 2870. doi:10.3390/ijerph18062870. PMC 7998651. PMID 33799682.
  50. ^ a b Christensen GJ (March 2002). "Orthodontics and the general practitioner". Journal of the American Dental Association. 133 (3): 369–371. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0178. PMID 11934193.
  51. ^ "How to become an orthodontist". Orthodontics Australia. 26 September 2017.
  52. ^ "Studying orthodontics". Australian Society of Orthodontists. 26 September 2017.
  53. ^ "Specialties and Specialty Fields". Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Agency.
  54. ^ "Medical Specialties and Specialty Fields". Medical Board of Australia.
  55. ^ a b c "Dhaka Dental College". Dhaka Dental College. Archived from the original on October 28, 2017. Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  56. ^ "List of recognized medical and dental colleges". Bangladesh Medical & Dental Council (BM&DC). Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  57. ^ "Orthodontic Facts - Canadian Association of Orthodontists". Canadian Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  58. ^ a b c "FAQ: I Want To Be An Orthodontist - Canadian Association of Orthodontists". Canadian Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  59. ^ "RCDC - Eligibility". The Royal College of Dentists of Canada. Archived from the original on 29 October 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  60. ^ "Accredited Orthodontic Programs - AAO Members". www.aaoinfo.org.
  61. ^ a b c d e f "About Board Certification". American Board of Orthodontists. Archived from the original on 16 February 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  62. ^ "Accredited Orthodontic Programs | AAO Members". American Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  63. ^ a b c d e f "Orthodontic Specialty Training in the UK" (PDF). British Orthodontic Society. Retrieved 28 October 2017.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

The American Association of Orthodontists recommends that children have their first orthodontic evaluation by the age of 7. This allows the orthodontist to detect any potential issues early and plan appropriate interventions if needed.
An orthodontist assesses your childs growth through various methods, including clinical examinations, dental X-rays, photographs, and sometimes cephalometric analysis. These tools help evaluate jaw relationships, tooth positioning, and overall facial symmetry to inform treatment decisions.
Considering growth and development is crucial because childrens jaws and teeth are still evolving. Understanding these dynamics allows orthodontists to time treatments effectively, using natural growth patterns to achieve better results with potentially shorter treatment durations.